人权理事会第二十九届常会开幕，听取来自人权事务高级专员的更新讲话（部分翻译）

上午/中午

2015年6月15日

来自波斯尼亚与黑塞哥维那和英国的高级别使团在理事会发言

人权理事会第二十九届常会今天上午开幕，会上听取了联合国人权事务高级专员扎伊德·拉阿德·侯赛因的讲话，他向理事会介绍了关于其办事处活动的最新信息。理事会随后举行了一场关于人权事务高级专员年度报告以及人权高专办和联合国秘书长报告的一般性辩论。会上还听取了波斯尼亚与黑塞哥维那外交部长伊戈尔·科恩纳达克以及大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国外国和联邦办事处国务卿巴洛尼斯·阿尔雷（Baroness Anelay）的讲话。

人权理事会主席约阿希姆·吕克尔（Joachim Rücker）在开场致辞中表示，鉴于不断升级的全球移徙危机每天都在造成越来越多的伤亡，根据欧盟的要求，理事会已决定召开一场关于“移徙者人权”问题的强化互动对话，对话将在有关高级专员口头更新报告的一般性辩论后举行。此外，爱尔兰常驻联合国纽约办事处代表兼2015年后发展议程政府间谈判的共同协调人多诺霍大使将于6月18日下午5点15分向理事会介绍有关目前谈判状态的信息。

高级专员扎伊德在开场致辞中支持进行外部审核，审议联合国关于中非共和国去年骇人听闻的儿童虐待指控处理情况的批评。他指出，政治动荡、压迫、暴力和战争已变得如此普遍，以至于促使数百万人冒着生命危险寻求相对安全的场所。叙利亚的冲突已杀害了至少22万男女老少，并造成了自二战以来最大的人口迁移，近700万人在该国内流离失所，400人正在逃离冲突。伊拉克的人道主义状况也引人重点关注，因为伊斯兰国还在对伊拉克人民犯下最可耻的侵害行为。令人遗憾的是，由于各国不愿意提供资金，联合国行动向伊拉克800多万人民提供的人道主义援助中有超过一半的不久将被切断。扎伊德先生还对包括利比亚、也门、布隆迪、索马里、尼日利亚、马里、埃及、巴林、巴勒斯坦被占领土、布隆迪、南苏丹、乌克兰东部、委内瑞拉、受到博科圣地影响的国家、缅甸和厄立特里亚在内的其他一些国家的人权状况表示关切，并对英国废除人权法案的计划以及这种举措可能在英国和其他国家带来的影响表示关切。

在随后进行的一般性辩论中，代表团对包括叙利亚、乌克兰、伊拉克和布隆迪在内的一些国家人权状况受到破坏表示深切和严重的关切，并呼吁理事会通过设立一项关于南苏丹人权状况的任务，以再次引起国际社会对南苏丹人民苦难遭遇的关注。

发言者对不断增加并对国际社会构成威胁的极端主义、恐怖主义和宗派暴力行为表示谴责，并表示国际社会需要一项明确的战略来打击这一现象和消除恐怖主义根源。 所有反恐措施必须符合国际法，各国也有责任通过问责和法治来保护其公民。移民流入、偷渡和贩运人口都是越发引人关注的全球现象。发言者强调了更好地解决移徙根源的紧急需要，并要求采取持久和全面的全球解决方法来解决贫困、欠发展和气候变化及其对人权的影响问题。

在一般性辩论中发言的有：摩洛哥代表法语国家国际组织，巴基斯坦代表伊斯兰合作组织，拉脱维亚代表欧洲联盟，阿尔及利亚代表非洲集团，伊朗代表不结盟运动，埃及代表一个意见相似的团体，挪威代表一个跨区域国家团体。爱尔兰，德国，摩洛哥，卡塔尔，大韩民国，塞拉利昂，美国，沙特阿拉伯，印度尼西亚，英国，南非，巴基斯坦，日本，纳米比亚，古巴，葡萄牙，黑山，俄罗斯，埃塞俄比亚，中国，萨尔瓦多，加纳，阿根廷，阿尔及利亚，巴拉圭，巴西，孟加拉国，印度，法国，博茨瓦纳，玻利维亚，尼日利亚，墨西哥，委内瑞拉，摩尔多瓦共和国，埃及，马尔代夫，莫桑比克，土耳其，突尼斯，乌克兰，伊拉克，贝宁，以色列，瑞士，澳大利亚，希腊，智利，捷克共和国，安哥拉，意大利，朝鲜人民民主共和国，比利时，约旦，西班牙，塞内加尔，巴林，阿塞拜疆，泰国，马来西亚，尼泊尔，叙利亚，尼日尔，多哥，苏丹，乌拉圭，伊朗，布隆迪，菲律宾，洪都拉斯，科威特，苏丹南部，布基纳法索，乌干达，加拿大，利比亚和乍得也在讨论中发言。

公民权利组织代表也在讨论中发言。其中包括：国际人权服务社，美国法学家协会，世界公民参与联盟，国际青年和学生拥护联合国运动，人权联盟国际联合会，萨拉姆基金会，联合国观察，希亚姆酷刑受害者康复中心，南风政策研究会，促进巴林民主和人权的美国人联盟和世界穆斯林大会。

理事会将于今天举行全日会议。理事会将于今天下午3点举行一场关于“移徙者人权”问题的互动对话，随后将与移徙者人权问题和少数群体问题特别报告员举行集体互动对话。

Statement by the High Commissioner for Human Rights

ZEID RA’AD AL HUSSEIN, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, said there had been much criticism of the United Nations regarding the handling of the allegations of appalling child abuse in the Central African Republic last year. Accordingly he supported the Secretary-General’s decision to establish an external review in which those criticisms and the conduct would be examined and judged, noting that everyone had to be held accountable and guided by the needs of victims. It was of deep concern to the Office when court orders were issued by the International Criminal Court in respect of the serving Head of State of Sudan, and State Parties to the Rome Statute openly flouted them.
Political turbulence, repression, violence and war had become so widespread that they impelled millions of people to risk their lives to find a place of relative safety. The Human Rights Council would therefore address the human rights of migrants. The conflict in Syria and the human rights violations taking place there posed a defining test for the international community. The conflict in Syria had killed at least 220,000 women, men and children, and had forced the largest movement of people since the Second World War, with more than 7 million people displaced within the country and 4 million fleeing it. The humanitarian situation in Iraq also called for deep concern as ISIL continued to perpetrate the most despicable abuses on the Iraqi people, in particular women, children and minorities, including the deliberate destruction of monuments. It was shameful that more than half of the humanitarian assistance that was brought to over 8 million people in Iraq by United Nations operations could very soon be cut off because States would not fund it.

The human rights situations in Libya and Yemen were also grave, in particular indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on civilian populations. In Yemen well over 20 million people were in need of assistance, whereas in Libya, the detention of migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees was widespread and prolonged. In the Middle East several governments in the region were fearful of extremist threats, which were widening to Somalia, Nigeria and Mali. Horrific abuse of human rights was perpetrated by takfiri groups. In Egypt cursory mass trials without adequate procedural guarantees had resulted in the imposition of the death penalty on hundreds of people since March 2014, whereas in Bahrain dozens of detainees had reportedly suffered torture and ill treatment. In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, UNRWA was marking its sixty-fifth anniversary, but sadly its work continued to be needed. In Gaza, the longstanding blockade and slow reconstruction were generating more poverty and further undermined economic and social rights. There was also concern over the human rights situation in Burundi, South Sudan, eastern Ukraine, Venezuela and countries affected by Boko Haram. The Human Rights Council would examine more deeply the factors that drove so many millions of people to leave their homelands, such as the persecuted Rohingya community in Myanmar, and the findings and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry on Eritrea. Another concern was the plan to scrap theUnited Kingdom's Human Rights Act and the impact that such an initiative would have both in the United Kingdom and in other countries.

Across all those contexts, women suffered in distinct and often disproportionate ways. Women and girls were often the victims of specific, and cumulative, violations and abuses, including mass abductions, rape, the increasing and despicable practice of sexual slavery, and forced pregnancies. Governments and the international community thus had to focus on the promotion of gender equality and women’s rights in their responses to violence and extremism. Even though there had been many recent advances in the protection of the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people, they still faced continuing, pervasive and violent abuse, harassment and discrimination. Far more had to be done to end that damaging discrimination. This year presented a vast opportunity to improve global progress and development with the pivotal Financing for Development Conference to be held in July in Addis Ababa, and the post-2015 development agenda summit in September in New York. Member States had responsibilities to achieve the right to development through increased international cooperation in the economic sphere, which was essential to rebooting global trade and investment. However, any agreements had to respect, rather than undercut, guarantees for economic and social rights, including labour rights and rights to food, water, health, and social security. States owed their people justice, equality and dignity, under the rule of law. If they did not ensure this, the people might be compelled to have recourse to rebellion against tyranny and oppression.

General Debate on the Annual Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Morocco, speaking on behalf of the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie, welcomed measures to improve communication between the Office of the High Commissioner and Member States and the stress the Office put on achieving results on the ground. The Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie asked for further information about the restructuring of the Office and expressed concern about financial difficulties negatively affecting the work of the Office. The Organisation proposed that the elections for the Advisory Group should use interpreters so that all candidates were presented on an equal footing.

Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, said that States had the primary role in the promotion and protection of human rights and the role of the Office was crucial in providing technical guidance to States in this regard. Politicization and selectivity eroded the trust and confidence and undermined the core of human rights institutions. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation reiterated the long-standing concern about the situation of the Rohingya and stressed the need to address the root causes of their rights violations, including their right to citizenship in Myanmar.

Latvia, speaking on behalf of the European Union, stressed the responsibility of States to protect their populations from acts of terror and to ensure accountability through the rule of law. The increase in migration flows, smuggling and trafficking of human beings were global phenomena of rising concern and the European Union stressed the urgent need to better deal with root causes of migration. The European Union remained deeply concerned about the growing number of victims and serious human rights violations in the eastern Ukraine, and about serious human rights violations committed daily in Burundi.

Algeria, speaking on behalf of the African Group, said the accomplishment of the right to peace and development was crucial for achieving development goals. It condemned extremism and terrorist acts everywhere, and called for measures to combat Boko Haram. The African Group was concerned by the dramatic situation of migrants in the Mediterranean, and demanded that lasting and comprehensive global solutions were undertaken to address poverty and underdevelopment. It also underlined the importance of addressing climate change and its impact on human rights.

Iran, speaking on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, underlined the importance of greater cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner. The Non-Aligned Movement was concerned about growing extremism and sectarian violence, which constituted a threat to the international community, and condemned atrocities by ISIS. It called on Israel to end human rights violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The Non-Aligned Movement reaffirmed its commitment to engage with the High Commissioner to strengthen human rights while ensuring respect for national sovereignty.

Egypt, speaking on behalf of a group of like-minded countries, emphasized the crucial role of technical assistance and capacity building at the request of States and in accordance with their national priorities. They called for all areas of human rights, including the right to development, to receive balanced resources. The countries were concerned about the increase of extra-budgetary resources being used by the Office of the High Commissioner, including for its field offices, and supported better geographic representation in its staff. They also called for greater transparency and non-selectivity in the work of the Office.

Norway, speaking on behalf of a cross-regional group of countries, noted that human rights defenders played a crucial role in the promotion and protection of human rights. A negative trend of criminalization of human rights defenders had been observed in all regions of the world. Arbitrary detention, imprisonment and sentencing of human rights defenders, including journalists, lawyers and political opponents was of great concern. All States were urged to fulfil their obligations under international human rights law to ensure the rights and safety of human rights defenders and all individuals who exercised the right to freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly or association.

Ireland said that the High Commissioner’s report highlighted States’ responsibilities in promoting human rights. Ireland appreciated the High Commissioner’s commitment to translate human rights norms into reality on the ground. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights could not function only in the abstract or on the basis of academic approaches. It had to bring its work closer to the rights-holders on the ground.

Germany welcomed the willingness of the High Commissioner to provide an informal briefing to the Human Rights Council on a number of pressing issues, in particular the migration crises in Europe and South-East Asia. It remained concerned about the shrinking space for civil society, and the increasing tendency to restrict the activities and the funding of civil society organizations, which stifled freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly and association.

Morocco called on States to make additional resources available to the High Commissioner to enable him to address the current challenges. The global crises such as terrorism, migration and epidemics like Ebola required the coordinated efforts of the international community. Morocco had launched its migration policy in 2013 which was focused on the right to work, housing, education and other areas, and looked forward to the High Commissioner’s support in its implementation.

Qatar said that discrimination on the basis of religion was on the agenda and reiterated the importance of the role of the High Commissioner and the Human Rights Council to implement relevant resolutions in this regard. Terrorism did not respect borders and undermined fundamental rights and freedoms and the international community needed a clear strategy to fight this phenomenon and eliminate the roots of terrorism, including marginalization.

Republic of Korea reiterated its concern about the growing number of migrants and said that the imperative was to provide immediate humanitarian assistance, but also to deal with the roots of the crisis. Despite progress, many women and girls still suffered violence and violations of their rights with impunity, particularly in situations of armed conflict. The Republic of Korea was committed to fighting terrorism and violent extremism and stressed that all counter-terrorism measures must conform to international law.

Sierra Leone appreciated the work of the Office of the High Commissioner despite financial constraints. It called for continued attention to ensure the eradication of the Ebola virus. Sierra Leone welcomed efforts to address gross violations by extremist groups in Africa and expressed deep concern about the situation of migrants and violations against them by smugglers. Sierra Leone welcomed initiatives to address the situation of persons with albinism, and asked for further efforts to ensure economic, social and cultural rights and the right to development.

United States underlined grave violations of human rights in South Sudan and the dire humanitarian situation there, regretted the lack of accountability for human rights violations in the country, and called on the Council to refocus international attention on the suffering of the South Sudanese people by establishing a mandate on the human rights situation in South Sudan. It was also deeply concerned about the situation in Bahrain, and urged Sri Lanka to continue its efforts towards accountability and reconciliation.

Saudi Arabia said its legal system was based on Sharia law and ensured access to justice to all its citizens. It condemned attempts to impose views and systems on other countries. Saudi Arabia reiterated its appeal to the international community to put an end to human rights violations by Israel. It was concerned about human rights violations in Syria, and the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. It called for greater attention to the humanitarian situation there. Saudi Arabia also expressed concerns regarding the situation of Rohingya Muslims and regarding human rights in Yemen.

Indonesia said the world was witnessing conflicts, including those between communities of different faiths. In Indonesia a strong reaction occurred when there was an insensitive action or expression toward the feeling of Muslims. There was a strong foundation in the society that guided inter-communal relations. That harmony and tolerance, however, needed to be nurtured. A comprehensive approach based on mutual respect and understanding was needed.

United Kingdom remained gravely concerned about the erosion of the human rights situation in a number of countries, particularly in Syria, Iran, Bahrain and Burundi. The violence that was perpetrated by ISIL was horrific, as well as the crimes committed by various Shia militias. All operations against Boko Haram should be conducted in accordance with international human rights law, whereas Egypt ought to respect the rights of imprisoned persons. The Government of Bahrain was encouraged to continue cooperating with the United Nations human rights mechanisms.

South Africa reiterated its continued support for the work of the High Commissioner and underlined the link between economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights, including the right to development, and the need for their full realization. Enhanced efforts in ensuring practical enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights remained key to eradicating extreme poverty, inequality and underdevelopment worldwide, which constituted, among others, root causes of migratory flows.

Pakistan asked the High Commissioner to brief the Council about the restructuring of his Office and how it would ensure more efficiency, professionalism, transparency, accountability and non-selectivity. Also, the High Commissioner should inform about the internal working mechanisms of his office, especially in terms of mainstreaming certain controversial and non-consensual issues and priorities while ignoring key fundamental human rights such as the right to development.

Japan continued to collaborate with international organizations to prevent sexual violence and support victims. It would address the continuing stigma and discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and would table a draft resolution on the subject. The human rights violations in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea continued to be grave and Japan welcomed the establishment of a field base structure in Seoul.

Namibia asked about the outcomes of the visits conducted by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Western Sahara and refugee settings where Saharawi people were living. Namibia welcomed the dialogue on migration which needed to underline the importance of acting on its root causes. There were country situations which required closer attention of the Council, and Namibia called for collaboration, constructive dialogue and consensus with States involved when negotiating the solutions.

Cuba regretted that the update of the High Commissioner was not circulated ahead of time, and was concerned about the increase of selectivity, politicization and double standards within the Council, underlining the importance of respect for the sovereignty of States. Cuba restated its unconditional support to the Government of Venezuela, and stated that nobody should intervene in the domestic affairs of another State.

Portugal welcomed efforts to address the situation of persons with albinism, and expressed concerns about attacks perpetrated against civilians, including women and children, everywhere in the world. Portugal expressed concerns about restrictions on freedom of expression and the continued use of the death penalty in many countries. Portugal then stressed the importance of addressing economic, social and cultural rights.

Montenegro agreed with the High Commissioner’s concern about violence and discrimination against migrants and vulnerable groups. Montenegro was also concerned about restrictions on freedom of expression and reprisals against human rights defenders. Increased migration flows and human trafficking and smuggling were issues of great concern. Montenegro also underlined the importance of accountability and the role of the Office of the High Commissioner for capacity building in post-conflict situations.

Russian Federation shared the concern of the High Commissioner about the situation in Ukraine, reminding that the cases of intimidation, abduction and torture committed by the Ukrainian forces remained unpunished. The international community would have to reckon with the fact that Crimea was an inseparable part of Russia. Peace in Ukraine could be achieved only through upholding and respecting the Minsk Agreement. Russia remained concerned about the situation in Syria, noting that a political solution could be achieved through the intensification of cooperation between international and regional actors.

Ethiopia welcomed the focus of the High Commissioner on the issue of migrants and underlined the important role played by his Office in that respect. It was noted that the right to development was crucial in the fulfilment of human rights in all their aspects. Poverty posed the greatest threat to the promotion if and respect for human rights. In that respect, fast economic growth would help address structural inequalities.

China thanked the High Commissioner for his report and underlined the importance of his Office’s work. It was necessary to pay attention to fostering a working environment of equality and respect and to abide by the rules of procedure. China paid great attention to the management and operations of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, noting that the communication of the Office with Member States should be conducted in a timely manner, and that staff of the Office should reflect appropriate geographic balance.

El Salvador shared concerns about human rights violations and violence in countries in conflict, particularly the precarious situation of people who sought refuge and the situation of unaccompanied children. Human rights were the axis of democratic development and democracy was a human right, particularly when emerging from a station of crisis. El Salvador stressed the obligations of the international community to establish a mechanism that would guarantee permanent social peace.

Ghana said that the human rights agenda must be given adequate attention through the provision of an adequate budget; without human rights, peace and security and other pillars of the United Nations could not be upheld. The promotion of dialogue was indispensable for political stability, good governance and the rule of law; terrorism must be condemned and no grievance could justify terrorism. All countries must refrain from doing to migrants what they were not doing to their own citizens.

Argentina said that more needed to be done to tackle effectively human rights situations and welcomed the enhanced discussion on the migration crisis today. There was a need for a change of paradigm for migration from seeing migration as a security issue to seeing it as a human rights issue. The Council should also discuss violence against women and improve the protection of older persons, while each State should ensure non-discrimination and combat violence on the grounds of sexual orientation.

Algeria noted the importance of equal treatment for all human rights, and said human development and improving living standards had to be taken into account in the post-2015 agenda. Terrorism was becoming more and more international, and a global and coordinated approach was needed to address the root causes of this phenomenon, including ransom payment. Algeria was concerned about the situation in Western Sahara, and called for accountability for human rights violations there.

Paraguay stressed the importance of ensuring adequate resources to the Office of the High Commission, and called for financial support for States requesting it for the implementation of recommendations. Migration was a very current issue and should be addressed through a holistic point of view and a human rights-based approach. Paraguay called for further activities on promoting the abolition of the death penalty.

Brazil said it was important to ensure the necessary holistic support and technical assistance to countries facing human rights challenges. Initiatives on human rights education should receive special support from the Office of the High Commissioner. Brazil also underlined the importance of mainstreaming human rights in all United Nations activities. Financial constraints should not have a negative impact on the realization of the mandate of the Office. Brazil welcomed the initiative by the High Commissioner to re-structure the Office.

Bangladesh emphasized the necessity to give equal focus to the promotion and protection of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, in the work of the High Commissioner and his Office. The right to development was vital for eradicating poverty and inequality among nations. The issue of migration needed a comprehensive solution and a holistic approach, whereas the issue of human resources management and geographical representation in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights had to be addressed as well.

India said that the promotion of human rights could be best achieved through constructive dialogue among States. The role of the international community and the United Nations was important in extending capacity building, technical aid and institution building aid in order to help States strengthen their mechanisms for the protection of human rights. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights should bear those issues in mind when dealing with international cooperation.

France underlined that it was important to protect human rights rather than institutions. It was thus important to note that human rights could not be compromised by any type of cultural relativism. France stressed the importance of the protection of human rights defenders, the provision of human rights to all persons regardless of their religious and ethnic belonging, the fight against impunity, the abolition of the death penalty, and the fight against discrimination and violence against women.

Statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina

IGOR CRNADAK, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina, said that during the previous nine years, the Council had become a central forum for sharing best practices, lessons learned and sharing awareness on various aspects of human rights. Bosnia and Herzegovina believed that the Universal Periodic Review was the “crown jewel” of the Human Rights Council, as there was no country in the world with an impeccable human rights record. Bosnia and Herzegovina had fully accepted 128 recommendations, partially accepted 38, and rejected only one recommendation made to it in the second Universal Periodic Review cycle. Bosnia and Herzegovina paid particular attention to the commitments deriving from that mechanism. It was paying particular attention to the protection of minorities, with a special focus on the Roma. Bosnia and Herzegovina attached great importance to gender equality and empowerment of women, where it was moving in the right direction, but much more needed to be done. Extremism of various nature and instability in various parts of the world continued to pose a threat to the world as a whole. Action was needed immediately if atrocities committed by the so-called Islamic State and Boko Haram were to be avoided. Economic migration was another rising trend, which could best be addressed by dealing with poverty and injustice.

Statement by the Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom

BARONESS ANELAY, Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom, recalled that this year was the eight-hundredth anniversary of the adoption of the Magna Carta, and underlined that the rights enshrined in it remained highly relevant today. She underscored appalling human rights violations in Syria, including by the Assad regime, insisted on the need for accountability and stressed the importance of the Commission of Inquiry in documenting violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law there. The Council also had to clearly address the current situation in South Sudan. Baroness Anelay expressed concern over the situations in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, where summary executions and torture had been perpetrated by both sides, and in Belarus. Baroness Anelay underlined that this year marked the twentieth anniversary of the Beijing Declaration and Programme of Action, and called for renewed international commitment to combat sexual violence. The voices of women, men, girls and boys victims of sexual violence in conflict had to be heard, and the circle of impunity had to end. The British Government renewed its commitment to combat sexual violence, both at the national and international levels. Universal values had to be truly universal, for everyone and everywhere.

General Debate

Botswana stated that the conflict in Syria continued to be a main point of concern for the international community. The situation was made worse by the ISIS terrorist activity. Botswana remained hopeful that humanity would be set free from the scourge of terrorism. There was also an absolute need for the international community as a whole to strengthen efforts towards finding sustainable solutions to migrants’ problems. Botswana continued to encourage the Council to speak out with one voice against the resurgence of racial bigotry and xenophobia.

Bolivia asked that the oral updates of the High Commissioner be published in advance so that delegations could better consult with their capitals. Bolivia was concerned about reference in the update that Bolivia authorized labour for children under the age of 12, without distinction. Bolivia, which had ratified various relevant conventions by the International Labour Organization, was implementing policies to fight child labour and exploitation at all levels and was striving to eradicate child labour by 2020.

Nigeria was deeply concerned about the unending armed conflicts in some countries, and new ones, which had led to worrying humanitarian situations. Nigeria was disturbed by the recent press release by the Office of the High Commissioner calling for justice for rights abuses in Nigeria, based on an unsubstantiated report by the group called “Stars on their shoulders, blood on their hands”. The report had had serious disturbing effects on the peace and social fabric of Nigeria. The Nigerian military was a disciplined force, which had proved its professionalism in many United Nations and regional peacekeeping operations.

Mexico shared concerns about migration which must be tackled using an approach based on the rights of persons and rights in general. This was an absolutely vital issue for the Sustainable Development Goals. There was a need to ensure that all counter-terrorism measures respected international humanitarian and human rights law. Mexico welcomed the role of the Office in supporting States in implementing their Universal Periodic Review recommendations through technical assistance.

Venezuela guaranteed the full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms without any discrimination and was a model of political tolerance in which people could freely express their opinions. The right to peaceful demonstrations was enshrined in the Constitution and was exercised daily by the citizens within the legal framework. It was regrettable that the High Commissioner for Human Rights leaned to the shameful practice of naming and shaming, which should be abandoned.

Republic of Moldova said that the expertise and independence of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights were crucial in the deepening crises that were confronting humanity. The Republic of Moldova welcomed the initiative to hold an enhanced dialogue on migration and supported the work of the monitoring mission in Ukraine, which was a situation of concern. The Republic of Moldova recognized the paramount activity of special procedures and treaty bodies that maintained a strong human rights system.

Egypt noted with concern the selective approach taken by the High Commissioner in his report and its presentation, and regretted that the High Commissioner had referred once more to the situation in Egypt. Egypt did not agree with the High Commissioner’s position with regard to the death penalty, and underlined the lack of international consensus on this issue. Egypt provided rules and guarantees to the accused, and the death penalty was only applied for the most serious crimes, including terrorism. The 2014 Constitution protected the rule of law and the right to a fair trial.

Maldives regretted that the statement by the High Commissioner had been made available very late. This year was an important year for climate change, and Maldives called for the inclusion of human rights in any agreement adopted later this year in Paris. Maldives remained concerned about the human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and the lack of accountability for violations by Israel during the Gaza conflict; it demanded that Israel lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip. Maldives called on both sides of the Yemeni conflict to engage with peace efforts by the United Nations.

Mozambique expressed appreciation at efforts by States to combat female genital mutilation, including through accepting recommendations made during the Universal Periodic Review process. Mozambique regretted the loss of human lives in the Mediterranean, and called for the issue of migration to be addressed urgently.

Turkey said that the situation in Syria constituted a threat to international peace and security, and the regime was continuing to commit crimes against its own population. The human rights situation in Palestine was still abysmal, and it was high time for the parties to the conflict there to share a unified vision of peace. The United Nations Human Rights Mission in Ukraine represented a good mechanism to monitor developments there, but the situation of some minority groups, such as the Crimean Tatars, was still a matter of concern.

Tunisia expressed thanks to the Office of the High Commissioner for the support which it had provided it during the period of transition. Tunisia stressed the importance of achieving full respect for human rights in cooperation with decision-makers at various levels and civil society. The intention of the Office of the High Commissioner to bring its Tunis office closer to other parts of the region was welcomed.

Ukraine positively assessed the work of the Office of the High Commissioner’s Monitoring Mission in Ukraine. The last report had clearly documented an extensive range of crimes and vast human rights violations, and the collapse of law and order in the self-proclaimed separatist regions. The Ukrainian Government was trying to rigorously reform the national human rights protection sphere, in collaboration with the relevant international organizations. There were no alternatives to the Minsk Agreements on the way to a steady ceasefire and stabilization.

Iraq noted that since June 2014 the country had been afflicted by an existential struggle against terrorists, which had nothing to do with religion. The terrorist group had no respect for human and religious rights. That terrorist phenomenon attracted thousands of young people who had nothing to do with the region’s cultural context and were destroying the heritage of human kind.

Benin said the world faced major challenges over the management of public affairs, the violation of human rights and liberties, poverty and social inequalities, among other issues. The Human Rights Council thus had to pursue actions and initiatives in a consensual manner in order to promote peace, security, human rights and freedoms, and dialogue among nations and communities.

Israel said that the concern regarding the efficiency and efficacy of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Council was inconsistent with the Council’s ever growing obsession with Israel. That hypocrisy continued with the establishment of the Commission of Inquiry on Gaza. The Council exhibited double morals and was ethically flawed.

Switzerland was concerned by the persistence of human rights violations in Ukraine and called on all actors to respect their international obligations. Switzerland expressed concerns regarding the dramatic situation of migrants at sea, and called for coordinated efforts to address this issue. It condemned intimidation and attacks against human rights defenders, and encouraged investigations on allegations of sexual abuse by peacekeepers in the Central African Republic.

Australia welcomed this session’s focus on gender equality, and underlined that women were disproportionally affected by human rights violations and abuses. Australia also welcomed the High Commissioner’s focus on the death penalty. Australia expressed concerns about the loss of countless lives at sea due to irregular migration. The priority for Australia was the protection of life at sea, and it would continue to remain open to refugees.

Greece underlined the importance of solidarity and fair sharing of burden and responsibilities, in particular cooperation with third countries of origin and transit, to address the situation of migrants. Greece strongly condemned any form of terrorism and called upon all States to actively and effectively confront this menace and step up cooperation on security matters.

Chile expressed concern over serious violations of human rights around the world and the rise of terrorism and violent extremism in different regions. Chile was pursuing its efforts to promote gender equality and to eradicate discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons; achieving inclusive societies was possible. As a non-permanent member of the Security Council, Chile had made protecting civilians in the time of conflict one of its priorities.

Czech Republic supported the independence of the Office of the High Commissioner and its staff, who were key to the mission of promoting and protecting human rights everywhere. Migration had to be addressed in a humane manner and in compliance with international human rights law. The Monitoring Mission in Ukraine was an example of how the Office could shed light on human rights abuses and violations.

Angola shared the concern of the High Commissioner when it came to systematic violations of human rights and worsening humanitarian situations in a number of regions. Angola had organized the Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the Great Lakes region on 18 May. The Summit had analysed recent developments, and provided for a general climate of moderate optimism. The international community ought to find an effective response to the human tragedy of Mediterranean migrants.

Italy appreciated the attention that the High Commissioner maintained on the issue of migration, and welcomed the enhanced dialogue on that issue. There should be a comprehensive and collective approach to address human rights of migrants in all regions of the world. In addressing that issue, Italy stressed that a selfish Europe would be a non-Europe. Italy also denounced persistent human rights violations in Syria, Libya, and South Sudan and in the Middle East.

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that the attempted establishment of the field structure on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in Seoul would be regarded as a political plot aimed at overthrowing the social system of the country, by fabricating and using human rights issues as propaganda. The Government therefore denounced and condemned it as a politicization of human rights which had no relevance to genuine human rights.

Belgium shared concerns of the High Commissioner and insisted on the need to defend civil society, which was often threatened by national laws on its funding. Belgium shared concerns over the situation in Burundi, noting the importance of the presence of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights there. It stressed that the good functioning of the Office was indispensable for the Council’s work, noting that it required adequate financing.

Jordan was concerned about the deterioration of the human rights situation in Syria, and condemned the continued occupation and human rights violations by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Jordan reiterated its support for a two-State solution. Jordan expressed concern over acts of terrorism and stressed its commitment to combat the root causes of terrorism.

Spain regretted the increased number of conflicts and atrocities committed and condemned violations of international law by the Assad regime, including the use of chemical weapons. Spain called on the Council to react appropriately to the current situations in Burundi and South Sudan. It condemned restrictions on freedom of expression, and expressed its opposition to the use of the death penalty.

Senegal welcomed the activities of the Office of the High Commissioner despite serious financial constraints. Senegal condemned abuses by Boko Haram and ISIS, and called for a coordinated response from the international community. Senegal expressed concerns about the situation of migrants, and called for further efforts to eradicate extreme poverty, improve access to education and health, and for the realization of economic, social and cultural rights.

Bahrain regretted that the update included wrong information about riots by prisoners on 10 March and that the Office of the High Commissioner had not included explanations sent to it about this event. The National Human Rights Institution and the Ombudsman for the rights of prisoners and detainees were currently looking into the recent prison riots. Bahrain believed that basic human rights had to be granted to all citizens, however, no one was above the law.

Azerbaijan was firmly on the road to building a law-abiding society. Human rights, in the view of Azerbaijan, had nothing to do with permissiveness to engage in illegal activities. Biased statements demanding the release of persons accused of committing concrete crimes meant undermining the independence of the judiciary system of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan was disappointed and discouraged to see vigorous reactions to individual cases of a criminal nature.

Thailand shared the High Commissioner’s concern about the problem of irregular migration at sea and would update the Council on the outcome of the Special Meeting in Bangkok on 29 May. The draft new Constitution in Thailand stipulated human rights as one of the key areas under the section on “Rights and Liberty”. A number of other human rights-related laws had also been passed or upgraded, including the Gender Equality Act and the Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking Act.

Malaysia shared the High Commissioner’s concern about the current migration crisis. Malaysia was one of the countries affected by the influx of irregular migrants and it remained committed to addressing the problem through various international and regional mechanisms. It was also concerned about the increased trend of extremism and the threat of terrorism around the world, as well as the increasing incidents of religious intolerance, particularly Islamophobia.

Nepal reiterated its support for all human rights as universal, indivisible, interrelated, interdependent and mutually reinforcing. The Government of Nepal was making efforts to institutionalize democratic principles through the promulgation of a constitution. It was also committed to addressing the issue of the provision of justice to victims through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and the Commission on Investigation of Disappeared Persons.

Syria said that the statement of the High Commissioner reflected partial politics and unfair accusations against the Syrian authorities. It constituted propaganda and resulted in support for terrorist groups in conflict with the Syrian Government. The High Commissioner ignored the crimes committed by the terrorists against Syrian civilians. The High Commissioner had also failed to mention the responsibility of those countries that supported terrorists in Syria.

Niger welcomed the High Commissioner’s proactive approach despite the financial constraints its faced. Niger welcomed the coordinated efforts by the international community to combat terrorist groups, including Boko Haram. Niger was concerned by the loss of lives of migrants at sea, and called for a holistic and long-term plan to combat the root causes of this phenomenon, including strengthening the right to development.

Togo affirmed its support to thematic issues underlined by the High Commissioner, and welcomed his focus on the situation of migrants at sea. Togo underlined the fruitful cooperation it had with the High Commissioner’s Country Office, and appealed for additional regular budget resources to finance the activities of the High Commissioner.

Sudan deeply regretted the double standards and politicization by the High Commissioner and some States, which undermined the credibility of the Council. Sudan particularly regretted that the High Commissioner referred to the International Criminal Court and its politically motivated allegations. The International Criminal Court was a political tool unfit to fulfil justice; it only targeted African countries and leaders.

Uruguay was particularly concerned about multiple human rights violations in conflict zones, resulting in displaced persons and refugees. The dire situation of women and children in such places was particularly alarming. Uruguay was also worried about the situation of migrants in the Mediterranean, which seemed to be deteriorating every day. Efforts by the Office of the High Commissioner to combat various forms of discrimination were appreciated.

Iran was alarmed by horrendous acts of religious and racial hatred in the world, particularly in western societies. On Palestine, Iran was deeply disturbed by the persistent gross and systematic violations of basic human rights principles. Iran called on the international community to urgently cease the illegal foreign military attacks against civilians in Yemen. Iran believed that the solution of the crisis in Syria had to be based on a Syrian-led national dialogue.

Burundi stated that the Office of the High Commissioner had not yet shared any results of its investigation into the actions of the youth group Imbonerakure. Burundi deplored the silence maintained by civil society actors, who sometimes incited youth from certain neighbourhoods to raise against the State institutions. The Government had already accepted the recommendations of the East African Community and scheduled communal and legislative elections for 29 June and presidential elections for 15 July.

Philippines appreciated the assistance of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the conduct of the panel discussion on climate change and human rights during the twenty-eighth session of the Human Rights Council. The Philippines encouraged the Human Rights Council to consider how the international community could answer the calls of vulnerable people and communities whose survival was at risk and who may be forced to leave their homes and migrate due to climate-change related events or disasters.

Honduras fully supported the High Commissioner’s work and congratulated him on the results achieved in fully integrating human rights in the post-2015 development agenda, as well as in actions for integrating human rights in the global management of migration. It fully supported the work of the High Commissioner, noting that his work should be strengthened in all respects, including the financial area. It also welcomed the opening of the Office’s branch in Tegucigalpa.

Kuwait emphasized that the growing number of requests addressed to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights required more funds for the holding of seminars and training. Kuwait was aware of the importance of international cooperation and was thus ready to provide financial support in that respect. Additional efforts by the Office were needed to address various human rights situations, such as the one in Syria. The suffering of the Palestinian people and serious human rights violations by Israel remained of great concern.

South Sudan said that there were positive developments on the ground in South Sudan. The Government had committed itself to protecting human rights in the country, and schools had been evacuated in order to spare children from fighting. The process of demilitarizing some 5,000 child soldiers was still ongoing. On the issue of creating a special procedure on South Sudan, that would be an impediment to the peace process on the ground and was thus unacceptable.

Burkina Faso said that international peace and security were a priority for all nations of the world. Burkina Faso’s transitional Government was committed to fighting inequality and injustice. Burkina Faso was planning to hold a presidential election in October 2015, for which technical and financial support by its partners was welcome. A National Commissioner for Reconciliation had been created and the National Pact for Renewal of Justice had been signed.

Uganda was greatly concerned about the devastating conflict in South Sudan, its immediate neighbour. Decisive steps were needed to urgently stop the fighting. Uganda continued to engage constructively with the Council and its bodies, and had undergone two reviews in 2015. While every country had the potential to champion human rights, time was needed to set up the necessary institutional and legal frameworks.

Canada stressed that States should ensure that laws on combatting violence against women and girls, including children, and early and forced marriage were robust and effectively enforced. It was deeply concerned by the continued Russian aggression against Ukraine and urged the Russian Federation to cease all aggression. It was also concerned about the violence in Burundi and urged the Government of Burundi to abide by its international obligations.

Libya appreciated the High Commissioner’s efforts to uphold and protect human rights worldwide. It reiterated its commitment to strengthen the rule of law and respect for fundamental freedoms despite the current challenges in Libya and the expansion of activities by terrorist groups. Cross-border crimes and illegal migration required the international community’s help, and Libya hoped that it would receive adequate support.

Chad said it shared the concerns of the High Commissioner regarding cruel acts of violence and violations of human rights taking place in various regions of the world. Chad called on the Human Rights Council to address those acts, noting that it was one of the countries directly affected by the constant threat posed by terrorist groups.

International Service for Human Rights shared the concern that the use or threat of detention were being used as a means of undermining defenders’ work and stifling their voices. That included the so-called Feminist Five in China, Nabeel Rajab in Bahrain and Raif Badawi in Saudi Arabia. Many States were enacting and enforcing laws to shut down their civil society organizations; in that regard, of particular concern were the steps of Russia, India, and Cambodia.

American Association of Jurists welcomed the announcement by the Council on sending a technical mission to Western Sahara. In the context of colonial occupation, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was called upon to ensure respect of fundamental freedoms and rights of the Sahrawi people and disclose the findings of the technical mission.

World Alliance for Citizen Participation - CIVICUS emphasized the High Commissioner’s urgent warning call to the Burundian Government to abstain from a blown up full civil war, from killing and torturing civilians, and from death lists. The World Alliance welcomed the release of the opposition journalist Emin Huseynov in Azerbaijan, but deplored the fact that dozens of others remained behind bars.

International Youth and Student Movement for the United Nations drew attention to the human rights of people of non-self-governing territories. It asked when and in what form the report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the mission to the occupied territories of Western Sahara and the Sahrawi refugee camps in Tindouf would be made available to the Human Rights Council.

International Federation for Human Rights Leagues said that the Human Rights Council could not fail the people of South Sudan any longer. The fight against impunity was a prerequisite for lasting peace in South Sudan. Deep concerns remained over the human rights situation in Burundi and the Federation called on the Council to urge the authorities there to respect and protect freedom of peaceful assembly, expression and information.

Al Salam Foundation welcomed the High Commissioner’s call that the plight of migrant workers be addressed. It was deeply concerned by the oppressive employment system that forced migrant workers in the Gulf States to continue working for abusive employers. That system remained in effect across those countries. Thousands of migrant workers laboured in the harshest conditions to build stadiums for the Qatar 2022 World Cup.

United Nations Watch said that countries that committed grave human rights violations were rewarded with a seat in the Human Rights Council, as was the case with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia was pounding Yemen indiscriminately but this had not been mentioned in the High Commissioner’s report, and nothing had been heard about the situation of women in Iran, which now held a seat on the board of United Nations Women.

Khiam Rehabilitation Centre for Victims of Torture said that tomorrow the High Criminal Court would decide in the case against Mr. Sulemain in Bahrain who had been tried for political statements he had made. The Council should call on Bahrain to immediately release him and other human rights defenders and detainees held for political purposes.

Verein Sudwind Entwicklungspolitik said that the High Commissioner’s report did not speak about 600 individuals executed in Iran over the first half of the year. An important challenge for the international community was to ensure accountability for those who committed human rights violations in Syria. There was deep concern about the situation in Yemen, and the eyes of all were on the peace negotiations on Yemen.

Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain shared the High Commissioner’s concerns about freedom of expression in Bahrain. A large number of people in the Gulf Cooperation Countries had been imprisoned and tortured for expressing dissent. A nephew of the speaker, who had been a blogger, had been exposed to torture, which had led to his death. It was terrible that Bahraini authorities arrested and tortured political prisoners, to which the attention of the Council needed to be drawn.

Human Rights Watch was particularly concerned that Australia had paid migrant smugglers to turn back. Human Rights Watch was concerned by continued efforts by the Egyptian Government to restrict the activities of independent human rights non-governmental organizations. The harassment of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights should end immediately. The new Government in Sri Lanka should ensure genuine consultations with those affected by violations.

World Muslim Congress said that the scale of human rights violations around the world had increased because the denial of the rights had also increased over time. The Human Rights Council was urged to impress upon the Government of India the need to put an end to human rights violations in Indian-occupied Kashmir and bring the perpetrators of violations to justice.

__________________

For use of the information media; not an official record