人权理事会延长了关于向中非共和国、索马里、苏丹和柬埔寨提供技术援助的任务授权（部分翻译）

上午

2015年10月2日

人权理事会通过了关于也门、刚果民主共和国、布隆迪、反暴力极端主义以及种族主义和种族歧视的决议

人权理事会今日上午通过了14项案文，分别关于延长中非共和国、索马里和苏丹人权状况独立专家以及柬埔寨人权状况特别报告员的任务授权。理事会建议秘书长建立关于非洲人后裔的论坛，作为散居非洲人后裔的协商机制以及人权理事会关于非洲人后裔的困境和需求的咨询机构。

今日上午通过的其他案文主要关于也门、布隆迪和刚果民主共和国在人权领域的技术援助和能力建设；避免和反对暴力极端主义；在全球呼吁反对种族主义、种族歧视、仇外心理和相关的不容忍现象问题的具体行动；在公共健康领域抵抗疫病的能力建设；移徙者的状况；国家政策和人权；以及促进支持国家人权跟进体系和进程的国际合作。

在技术援助和能力建设的议程项目下，理事会决定将中非共和国人权状况独立专家、索马里人权状况独立专家、苏丹人权状况独立专家的任务授权延期一年，并将柬埔寨人权状况特别报告员的任务授权延期两年。理事会呼吁也门所有相关方立即停止对于平民的侵害，以确保受到影响的群体获得人道主义援助，结束雇佣和使用童工，释放已被雇用的人们。理事会要求人权事务高级专员明确对也门进行技术援助的其他领域，并在其第三十三届会议上向人权理事会提交进程报告。

理事会邀请刚果民主共和国继续为结束有罪不罚付出努力，首先考虑性犯罪行为人，还需针对所有侵犯人权的人，并要求国际社会优先考虑结构性援助和长期援助以优化技术援助方案的长期影响。在一项关于对布隆迪实施技术援助的决议中，理事会呼吁布隆迪当局对于所有侵犯和践踏人权行为进行彻底和独立的调查，并要求人权事务高级专员在人权理事会第三十一届会议上做口头情况更新。

在关于技术援助和能力建设的其他决议中，理事会要求人权事务高级专员办事处组织专家研讨会，讨论有效、包容且参与性的机制和方式以实现人权在形成和落实公共政策中的主流化。此外，理事会要求高级专员组织为期半日的闭会期间小组讨论，在工作组关于普遍定期审议的第二十六届会议上分享建立和加强国家人权跟进系统的经验和良好做法。理事会还决定了在其第三十一届会议技术援助和能力建设议程项目下的年度主题小组讨论主题为“促进和保护包括妇女、儿童、老年人和残疾人在内的所有移徙者权利的技术合作和能力建设”，并要求联合国人权事务高级专员办事处准备关于支持各国促进和保护移徙者权利在其国家立法、政策和方案方面的活动的报告，并于人权理事会第三十一届会议上呈递。

理事会以37票赞成、3票反对及7票弃权的表决结果通过了一项关于人权与避免和反对暴力极端主义的决议，决定在其第三十一届会议上召开小组讨论，商讨避免和反对暴力极端主义的人权层面问题，并要求人权事务高级专员办事处在理事会第三十三届会议上准备一份关于保护和促进人权的良好做法和吸取的教训如何在避免和反对暴力极端主义中发挥重要作用的汇编报告。

理事会以32票赞成、12票反对及3票弃权的表决结果要求有效执行《德班宣言和行动纲领》政府间工作组开始准备通过《德班宣言和行动纲领》的十五周年纪念，并在理事会第三十一届会议上呈递报告。

理事会以32票赞成、12票反对及3票弃权通过口头修订一项关于散居非洲人后裔的论坛的决议，建议秘书长撤销成功落实《德班宣言和行动纲领》的知名独立专家的任务授权，为了取代这项任务授权，建立关于非洲人后裔的论坛，作为散居非洲人后裔的协商机制以及人权理事会关于非洲人后裔的困境和需求的咨询机构。

在关于通过在公共健康领域抵抗疫病的能力建设促进人人有权享有最佳身心健康的主席声明中，理事会强调，需要在平等的基础上加强努力，以确保普遍尊重促进、保护和实现所有人的所有人权和基本自由，并减少疫病的伤害性和避免相关的歧视和成见。

以下国家介绍了案文：摩洛哥、哥伦比亚、俄罗斯联邦、中国、代表非洲集团的阿尔及利亚、沙特阿拉伯、英国、索马里、泰国、日本、厄瓜多尔、秘鲁、巴拉圭和巴西。

也门、苏丹、柬埔寨、刚果民主共和国和布隆迪作为当事国发言。

以下国家在一般性意见中发言：纳米比亚、阿尔及利亚、阿尔巴尼亚、代表欧盟的荷兰、美国和塞拉利昂。

以下代表在投票前对其投票进行了解释：美国、法国、摩洛哥、前南斯拉夫马其顿共和国、阿尔巴尼亚、英国、巴西、俄罗斯联邦、古巴、巴基斯坦、越南、南非、委内瑞拉、代表欧盟的荷兰和加纳。

委内瑞拉、日本、荷兰和德国在投票后对其投票进行了解释。

人权理事会将于今日下午3点举行会议，继续对案文草案开展工作，任命特别程序和任务负责人，并结束第三十届常会。

Action on Resolution under the Agenda Item on the Annual Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Action on Presidential Statement on Promoting the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health through Enhancing Capacity-Building in Public Health against Pandemics

In a presidential statement (A_HRC_30_L.43) on promoting the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health through enhancing capacity-building in public health against pandemics, adopted without a vote, the Council emphasizes the need for intensified efforts to ensure universal respect for, promotion, protection and fulfilment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, on the basis of equality, and to reduce vulnerability to pandemics and prevent related discrimination and stigma; calls for the development of resilient and sustainable health systems, including through national efforts and international cooperation; and recognizes the vital and complementary role of civil society in responding to pandemics.

Action on Resolutions under the Agenda Item on the Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right to Development

Action on Resolution on Human Rights and Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.25_Rev.1) on human rights and preventing and countering violent extremism, adopted by a vote of 37 in favour, three against, and seven abstentions, the Council urges States to take measures to ensure that counter-terrorism laws and implementing measures are consistent with and are applied in a manner that fully respects human rights; calls upon Member States to advocate for and disseminate information on tolerance and mutual respect, and underlines the potential contribution of the media and new communications technologies, including the Internet, to promoting respect for all human rights; decides to convene a panel at its thirty-first session to discuss the human rights dimensions of preventing and countering violent extremism; requests the Office of the High Commissioner to prepare a summary report on the panel discussion; and requests the Office of the High Commissioner to prepare a compilation report on best practices and lessons learned on how protecting and promoting human rights play a critical role in preventing and countering violent extremism by the thirty-third session of the Council.


The result of the vote was as follows:

In favour (37): Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Maldives, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, Paraguay, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom , United States of America, and Viet Nam.

Against (3): Russian Federation, South Africa, and Venezuela.

Abstentions (7): Bolivia, China, Cuba, El Salvador, Kazakhstan, Namibia, and Pakistan.


Action on Amendment L.37

The Council rejected the amendment L.37 by a vote of 14 in favour, 26 against, and seven abstentions.

Action on Amendment L.38

The Council rejected the amendment L.38 by a vote of 10 in favour, 27 against, and 10 abstentions.

Action on Amendment L.39

The Council rejected the amendment L.39 by a vote of 11 in favour, 26 against, and 10 abstentions.

Action on Amendment L.40

The Council rejected the amendment L.40 by a vote of 14 in favour, 25 against, and eight abstentions.


Morocco, introducing draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, said that the prevention of and the fight against violent extremism required cooperation that went beyond borders, cultures and civilizations. Everyone had the obligation to invest in international cooperation in fighting violent extremism while respecting human rights. Weapons of mass instruction must be used: investment in young people’s education and eradication of poverty were crucial. Traditional and social media, academia, governments, civil society and other parts of society must be mobilized in the fight against violent extremism and its consequences, and the Rabat Plan of Action was a useful tool in this regard.

Colombia, also introducing draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, said that the aim was to strengthen the fight against violent extremism, and it was important to take the human rights dimension into account in all efforts of tackling and preventing violent extremism in all its forms and manifestations. Colombia believed that the panel that the resolution called for holding next March would make a significant contribution in this regard.

Russia, introducing draft amendments L.37, L.38, L.39, and L.40 to draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, expressed the conviction that armed conflict and interference in the internal affairs of States were among chief reasons for the rise of violent extremism. States bore the primary responsibility for preventing and combatting violent extremism. Russia then introduced oral amendments to the draft resolution L.25/Rev.1.

United States, speaking on behalf of the sponsors of the draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, said that the amendments introduced by Russia were not acceptable to the sponsors.

China, introducing draft amendments L.41 and L.42 to draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, expressed concern about the increasing use of information and communication technology to commit, incite, recruit for, plan or commit terrorist acts. The draft amendments emphasized the central role of the United Nations in the fight against violent extremism, and the complying of the United Nations agencies with their mandate in doing so. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights was requested to study how to combat violent extremism and China hoped co-sponsors could accept those oral amendments.

United States, speaking on behalf of the sponsors of the draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, said that the amendments introduced by China were not acceptable to the sponsors.

JOACHIM RÜCKER, President of the Human Rights Council, said that China had withdrawn draft amendments L.41 and L.42 to the draft resolution L.25/Rev.1.

Algeria, speaking in a general comment, said that extremist phenomena were becoming more and more interlinked, and that the draft resolution could help fight these phenomena. Fighting extremism must also include fighting racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, which appeared to be new faces of violent extremism. The fight against terrorism and violent extremism would be a long one, and it would be crucial to continue to strengthen democracy and international cooperation. Special attention must be given to closing down sources of financing, and the fight must be extended to social media outlets which were now the main channels for the recruitment and spreading of poisonous ideas.

Albania, speaking in a general comment, said that the draft resolution was a timely initiative, especially in the Human Rights Council, as an instrument to highlight the importance of respecting human rights in all attempts to combat violent extremism and all its manifestations. Violent extremism must not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilisation or ethnic group. The draft resolution stressed the need for States to prevent violent extremism, including thorough empowering youth, women, religious and other leaders, and addressed the upstream factors of this very challenging phenomenon.

Namibia, speaking in a general comment, regretted that the text did not mention the right to self-determination.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on amendment L.37, said the draft resolution incorporated all amendments into the main text. The core group recognised all forms racism, xenophobia and other forms of discrimination that individuals were subjected to. However, the amendment did not address the root causes of violent extremism.

France, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on amendment L.37, said violent extremism was a very significant matter to discuss. Fighting racial discrimination was a responsibility for all States. The Council, on different occasions, had reiterated its fight against racism. However, the delegation could not accept the amendment as it restricted the factors contributing to violence. France encouraged all Member States to vote against it.

Morocco, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft amendment L.38, said that the core group rejected this amendment and that after several rounds of negotiations it was possible to maintain a draft resolution that was balanced in listing the causes of violent extremism. The Council reaffirmed the need to address the many factors leading to violent extremism, including some of those proposed in the amendment. Limiting the interference in internal affairs of States would limit the scope of activity of the Council.

France, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft amendment L.38, said that the intention was to introduce into the work of the Council political matters and France called upon Member States to vote against.

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft amendment L.39, said that the amendment was confusing and addressed issues already included in the main text of the draft resolution. The core group had already stressed the need for the whole-of-society approach to combatting violent extremism and had stressed the importance of education. The draft amendment could not be accepted.

Albania, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft amendment L.39, said that the phrasing of the draft amendment suggested that States could circumvent their human rights situation in the fight against violent extremism and created loopholes allowing States to respect their national laws even if they were in contradiction with international human rights law.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft amendment L.39, pointed the attention of the Council to a paragraph in the main text of the draft resolution that addressed this issue.

United Kingdom, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on amendment L.40, said the core group could not accept the amendment as it was unnecessary. The proposed amendment, unfortunately, was not an accurate reflection of the reality.

Brazil, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on draft resolution L.25/Rev.1, said it would vote in favour, and expressed appreciation for the reference in the text to the tolerance and appreciation of others, and the important role played by the Alliance of Civilizations in this regard. The text should have addressed in more details that the best ways to combatting violent extremism were prevention, together with addressing extremist discourse and addressing the underlying causes, especially those related to persistent social, political and economic exclusion. Brazil stressed that the use by violent extremists of information and communication technology for the purpose of radicalizing must be addressed in full respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular the right to privacy. Such technologies were powerful tools in countering the spread of violent extremism and terrorism including in promoting dialogue between people on peace.

Russian Federation, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, said it was committed to fight against all forms of terrorism. The delegation was convinced that actions must be taken in partnership with the Governments and civil society. While doing so, all must respect the ‘sovereignty’ of States, and not interfere with internal affairs. One of the main concerns of the delegation was that the co-authors of the draft text refused to include the key role of States in fighting terrorism. The text also lacked several other important elements, such as defining violent extremism and ways to combat it. Accordingly, it would vote against the draft.

Cuba, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, condemned all forms of violent extremism and terrorism. The delegation noted that terrorism could not be solved through violence but through international cooperation. The text, unfortunately, did not sufficiently determine the causes of such acts. Accordingly, the delegation would abstain from voting.

Pakistan, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, thanked all delegations for the open and transparent discussion. However, the Human Rights Council was not the appropriate place to discuss violent extremism and terrorism. Accordingly, the delegation would abstain from voting.

Viet Nam, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, strongly supported all comprehensive attempts to combat and prevent violent extremism in line with international law and reaffirmed the primary responsibility of States in this regard. For this reason, Viet Nam would vote in favour of this draft resolution. Viet Nam hoped that further deliberations under the United Nations framework would help in the clarification of concepts of violent extremism and terrorism.

South Africa, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, said that it was clear that gaps between delegations were unbridgeable and that some preferred to use domestic constitutional provisions on combatting violent extremism, while others preferred to remain within the framework of the 1949 Bill of Rights. South Africa remained unwavering that norms and standards of international law must be respected at all times. South Africa was concerned that several resolutions presented during this session aimed to circumvent article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which did not reflect well on the integrity of the Human Rights Council. Of central importance was that the core group had failed to accept the proposal to make the distinction between legitimate fights for liberation and statehood and violent extremism. Such noble attempts for freedom and human rights must not be confounded with violent extremism and that was why South Africa, with its history of the fight against oppression, could not support this text and would vote against it.

Venezuela, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, reiterated its strong support to all attempts to fight against violent extremism and terrorism. It also reaffirmed the primary responsibility of States in that regard. However, the delegation was disappointed that the text lacked appropriate balance with regards to the United Nations Charter.

Action on Resolution under the Agenda Item on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance

Action on Resolution From Rhetoric to Reality: a Global Call for Concrete Action against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.20): From Rhetoric to Reality: a global call for concrete action against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, adopted as orally revised with a vote of 32 in favour, 12 against, and three abstentions, the Council calls upon all States to end posturing and denialism about the existence of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; requests the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action to commence preparations for the commemoration of the fifteenth anniversary of the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, and to present a report to the Council thereon at its thirty-first session; and invites Member States, the United Nations system and all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organizations, to intensify their efforts for building support for the full and effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action in the follow-up to the commemoration of the fifteenth anniversary of its adoption.


The result of the vote was as follows:

In favour (32): Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Maldives, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Viet Nam.

Against (12): Albania, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Montenegro, Namibia, Netherlands, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom, and United States of America.

Abstentions (3): Japan, Portugal, and Republic of Korea.


Algeria, introducing draft resolution L.20 on behalf of the African Group, said that since the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the African Group had done everything it could to ensure its implementation. This year’s text aimed to ensure the efficient planning of the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action on its anniversary, under several United Nations mechanisms. Further, the aim was to evaluate the progress made by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Algeria then introduced oral amendments to the draft text.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, reiterated its commitment to fighting racism and to the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. The reservations of the United States on the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights were well known. The United States had significant concerns about this resolution. The United States called for a vote and would vote against it.

Netherlands, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on behalf of the European Union, highlighted that the European Union was fully committed to ensuring human rights for all without discrimination and shared the deep concern that racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance continued to persist. However, the European Union could not support this resolution. Its language was imprecise. A number of operational paragraphs contravened the Durban Declaration and Programme of Work. The European Union also deeply regretted the lack of constructive dialogue and willingness to accept concerns from it or from civil society.

Ghana, in an explanation of the vote before the vote, believed that the text was based on universal values. Those opposed to the resolution, accordingly, should reconsider their actions. If they wished, they could disassociate themselves from certain paragraphs.

Action on Resolution on the Forum on People of African Descent in the Diaspora

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.21) on the Forum on People of African Descent in the Diaspora, adopted as orally revised by a vote of 32 in favour, 12 against, and three abstentions, the Council recommends that the Secretary-General, through the General Assembly, review and rescind the mandate of the independent eminent experts for the successful implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and, in lieu of this mandate, to establish a forum on people of African descent; also recommends that the mandate of the forum on people of African descent shall be to serve as a consultative mechanism for people of African descent in the diaspora as well as an advisory body to the Human Rights Council on the plight and needs of the people of African descent; and decides that the modalities and the structure of the forum will be decided following regional consultations in areas where people of African descent live, and bearing in mind their views and priorities.


The result of the vote was as follows:

In favour (32): Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mexico, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Viet Nam.

Against (12): ): Albania, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Montenegro, Netherlands, Portugal,The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom, and United States of America.

Abstentions (3): ): Japan, Maldives, and Republic of Korea.


Algeria, introducing the draft resolution L.21 on behalf of the African Group, said the text included a series of measures for the effective launching of the Forum on People of African Descent living in the Diaspora. The African Group underlined the importance of the participation of civil society in the consultations and expressed concern at recent attempts at renegotiating the provisions of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, which was the only document that provided recourse to the victims of racism. Algeria introduced oral amendments to the draft text. The African Group welcomed the agreement reached between United Kingdom and Jamaica for reparations for historic debts of slavery.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, said it attached great importance to the fight against all forms of racism. The delegation believed in the purpose of the draft resolution. However, the delegation was concerned about the undetermined high cost of the regional consultations, and would vote against it.

Brazil, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on behalf of a group of countries, said Brazil was fully committed to the full implementation of the programme of activities for the implementation of the International Decade for People of African Descent. The region would be holding its first regional meeting at the end of 2015, and would enjoy the participation of all African descendent people from across the region.

Netherlands, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote on behalf of the European Union, said the fight against racism should be a concern to all States, and the international community should be united to address the issue. Despite the European Union’s good faith and cooperation efforts, it had some concerns about the draft. It did not reflect or implement the programme of activities for the implementation of the International Decade for People of African Descent. Also, the title did not reflect the severity against people of African descent which was in all regions of the world, not just the diaspora. Accordingly, the European Union would vote against it.

Venezuela, speaking in an explanation of the vote after the vote on agenda item 9, said that the world was suffering from a worrying rise in racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance. This was a serious challenge. Moreover, there was a need to look into reparations for historical wrongs. Venezuela continued to support the development of important mechanisms in this regard, and for the implementation of the International Decade of People of African Descent. Venezuela reiterated the commitment to fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance and would continue to actively participate in efforts to ensure the protection of human rights of people of African descent.

Action on Resolutions under the Agenda Item on Technical Assistance and Capacity Building

Action on Resolution on Technical Assistance and Capacity-Building for Yemen in the F0ield of Human Rights

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.1_Rev.1) on technical assistance and capacity-building for Yemen in the field of human rights, adopted as orally revised without a vote, the Council calls upon all parties in Yemen to respect their obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law, to stop immediately attacks on civilians and to ensure humanitarian access to the affected population; demands that all Yemeni parties to the conflict end the recruitment and use of children and release those who have already been recruited; reiterates the commitments and obligations of the Government of Yemen to promote and protect the human rights of all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction; and invites all bodies of the United Nations system and Member States to assist the transitional process in Yemen. The Council also requests the High Commissioner to provide technical assistance and to work with the Government of Yemen in the field of capacity-building and to identify additional areas of assistance to enable Yemen to fulfil its human rights obligations, and to present to the Human Rights Council, at its thirty-third session, a progress report on the implementation of the program of technical assistance and capacity-building in the field of human rights in Yemen.

Saudi Arabia, introducing on behalf of the Arab Group and the League of Arab States draft resolution L.1/Rev.2 as orally revised on technical assistance to Yemen, thanked the delegates for their collaboration on the preparation of this text. Yemen was undergoing very difficult and complicated circumstances which required the support of this Council and the international community. Yemen was committed to collaborating with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Yemen, speaking as the concerned country, thanked the Arab Group for their support to Yemen and all delegates for their cooperation in the preparation of the draft resolution, particularly the Netherlands. This had enabled the Member States to reach a balanced text. The tragic situation of Yemen needed the support and assistance of the Human Rights Council and the continued positive cooperation of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, to administer justice and promote reconciliation through national mechanisms. The national commission of inquiry ensured the participation of women, took into account the geographical entirety of the country and would investigate all human rights violations. Yemen was in need of technical assistance, capacity building and humanitarian assistance. Yemen hoped that this draft resolution would enjoy the support of the Council.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, said it was deeply concerned about the current humanitarian crisis in Yemen. The situation was deeply affecting the civilian population, and humanitarian relief was being impeded. To that end, the assistance of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was vitally important to monitor and report all forms of violations in Yemen. The United States looked forward to receiving a detailed country report in the near future. He urged all Member States to respect international law, and cooperate with the High Commissioner. Concluding, the United States appreciated the efforts taken by the delegation of the Netherlands in the preparation of the text, addressing the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Yemen.

Action on Resolution on Technical Assistance and Capacity Building in the Field of Human Rights in the Central African Republic

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.6) on technical assistance and capacity building in the field of human rights in the Central African Republic, adopted without a vote, the Council calls on the authorities of the Central African Republic to ensure respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms to the whole population and to take all necessary measures to end the impunity of perpetrators of acts of violence and other violations and abuses of human rights; requests the transitional authorities and the national elections authority to take the necessary steps, in accordance with the Transitional National Charter, to speed up the preparatory electoral process; urges the international community to provide assistance in the setting up of a mechanism by the Central African authorities to fight against trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder victims, including children and victims of sexual violence; decides to renew, for one year, the mandate of the independent expert to assess and to monitor the situation of human rights in the Central African Republic; and requests all parties to fully cooperate with the independent expert in carrying out her mandate.

Algeria, introducing the draft resolution L.6 on behalf of the African Group, said that the draft resolution encouraged the United Nations Member States in the framework of international cooperation, the relevant United Nations bodies and international financial institutions, as well as donors, to provide technical assistance and help in capacity building to promote respect for human rights and develop the justice and security sector in the Central African Republic. The African Group called upon the Independent Expert to work closely with all United Nations bodies, the African Union and other relevant bodies, and asked the Office of the High Commissioner to provide an oral update to the Council at its thirty-first session. The draft resolution also called for an interactive dialogue in the human rights situation in the country, with a focus on transitional justice.

Netherlands, speaking in a general comment on behalf of the European Union, welcomed this draft resolution which allowed the Council to remain seized with the human rights situation in the Central African Republic. Clear progress had been achieved in the past month, but the situation remained very fragile and called for great vigilance, as testified by the murderous events in Bangui last week. The security situation remained a challenge, with an increase in crime and a weakening of the judiciary. The European Union was pleased that this draft resolution addressed all those issues and proposed to the authorities a number of concrete measures to improve the situation. The European Union also welcomed the extension of the robust mandate of the Independent Expert which would allow monitoring of the situation and the formulation of recommendations which would help the country to emerge from the crisis.

United States, speaking in a general statement, said it was pleased to co-sponsor the text to increase efforts to address the human rights situation in the Central African Republic. Supporting the current President and the transitional Government, the United States noted that positive progress was taking place. The United States strongly condemned the ongoing violence in the country. Those responsible for such violence must be held accountable for their actions.

Action on Resolution on Assistance to Somalia in the Field of Human Rights

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.7) on assistance to Somalia in the field of human rights, adopted without a vote, the Council strongly condemns the serious and systematic violations and abuses perpetrated against members of the civilian population, including women, children, journalists, parliamentarians and human rights defenders, by Al-Shabaab and its affiliates; welcomes the commitment of the Federal Government of Somalia to improving human rights in Somalia; urges the international community to provide financial support to enable host countries to respond to the ongoing humanitarian needs of Somali refugees in the region, and to support the reintegration of those returning to Somalia as well as internally displaced persons; stresses the important role of joint monitoring and reporting of the situation of human rights in Somalia by domestic and international experts; decides to renew the mandate of the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia, under agenda item 10, for a period of one year; and requests the Independent Expert to report to the Human Rights Council at its thirty-third session.

United Kingdom, introducing draft resolution L.7 on technical assistance to Somalia in the field of human rights, said that Somalia had made progress in setting itself on the path of peace and prosperity, including the setting up of the Transitional Government in 2012, preparation to elections, while the Compact had drawn more significant pledges, including from the United Kingdom. There was still a significant path ahead, particularly in addressing the threat of Al-Shabaab; the support by the Council and the international community would be crucial. The draft resolution called on Somalia to take key steps in addressing the human rights situation, called upon the international community to support those efforts, and called for the extension of the mandate of the Independent Expert on human rights situation in Somalia.

Somalia, also introducing the draft resolution L.7, thanked the United Kingdom, the Group of Friends of Somalia, the African Group, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development and all other delegations that had engaged in a constructive spirit of openness. The draft resolution demonstrated the commitment of Somalia in the field of human rights and believed that its implementation would hugely contribute to the creation of an open and democracy society and would solidify progress achieved by the Transitional Government. Somalia urged donors to be more generous in providing resources in a coordinated manner to the Government, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Independent Expert. The draft resolution was very important for the future of Somalia as it contained many important initiatives which would improve the human rights situation.

Sierra Leone, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, fully supported the draft resolution, and invited the Council to respect Somalia in its efforts to achieve political stability. The resolution encouraged the international community to provide financial and technical support to the concerned country. Concluding, the delegation noted that the political will of Somalia was clear.

Action on Resolution on the Enhancement of Technical Cooperation and Capacity-building in the Field of Human Rights

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.10_Rev.1) on enhancement of technical cooperation and capacity-building in the field of human rights, adopted without a vote, the Council emphasizes that the discussion to promote technical cooperation and capacity-building in the Human Rights Council should be based on consultations with and the consent of the States concerned, and should take into account their needs; underscores the importance of international, regional and bilateral cooperation and dialogue in the protection of the human rights of all migrants; and decides that the theme for the annual thematic panel discussion under agenda item 10 to be held during its thirty-first session will be “Technical cooperation and capacity-building to promote and protect the rights of all migrants, including women, children, older persons and persons with disabilities”. It also requests the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a report on the activities undertaken by the Office, other relevant United Nations agencies and, where applicable, regional organizations to support efforts by States to promote and protect the rights of migrants in their national legislation, policies and programmes, and to submit it to the Human Rights Council at its thirty-first session.

JOACHIM RÜCKER, President of the Human Rights Council, said that the adoption of this resolution meant that the Human Rights Council remained seized with the situation of migrants.

Thailand, introducing draft resolution L.10, said this resolution was tabled annually to strengthen the Council’s role in promoting advisory services, technical assistance and capacity building through panels. This year’s resolution proposed the theme of “Technical cooperation and capacity building to promote and protect the rights of all migrants, including women, children, older persons and persons with disabilities” for the panel discussion to be held during the thirty-first session of the Human Rights Council. This was particularly relevant in view of the pressing human rights concerns faced by the migrants.

Netherlands, in a general comment on behalf of the European Union, said this year’s focus was particularly relevant given the challenges raised by the current migrant crisis, and underlined the responsibility of countries of origin, transit and destination in protecting human rights for all migrants and addressing the root causes of migration, and underlined the importance of international cooperation to tackle regular and irregular migration. The European Union would join the consensus on this draft resolution.

Action on Resolution on Technical Assistance and Capacity-building in Sudan

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.18) on technical assistance and capacity-building to improve human rights in Sudan, adopted without a vote as orally revised, the Council encourages the initiative of holding a comprehensive, inclusive national dialogue in Sudan to achieve sustainable peace; encourages the Government of Sudan to further promote and protect the right to freedom of religion and belief; urges the Government of Sudan to further its efforts for the promotion and protection of human rights, in particular to ensure freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention; requests the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to provide technical assistance and capacity-building to the Government of Sudan by its request on ways to improve the human rights situation in the country; decides to renew the mandate of the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the Sudan for a period of one year, and requests the Independent Expert to present a report to the Human Rights Council at its thirty-third session. It also calls upon the Government of the Sudan to continue its full cooperation with the Independent Expert.

Algeria, introducing the draft resolution on behalf of the African Group, thanked international and local partners for their efforts. The African Group was deeply concerned about the humanitarian situation in the country, as well as the lack of protection of refugees and internally displaced persons. The Group attached great importance to the work conducted by the Independent Expert in response to the current situation in Sudan. The draft resolution, in that regard, renewed the mandate of Independent Expert. The African Group looked forward to seeing the Expert’s future reports, and welcomed the flexibility of countries on the subject. Algeria introduced oral amendments to the draft text.

Netherlands, speaking in a general statement on behalf of the European Union, noted that the European Union was extremely concerned about the political instability, lack of security, human rights violations, and the armed conflict in Sudan. It was also worried about reports of arbitrary arrests, closure of media houses, and confiscation of newspapers. The draft resolution would enable the access of the Independent Expert to the country to monitor the current situation and reforms of the national legislation. The European Union urged the Government of Sudan to take all necessary measures to tackle impunity, and to ensure the protection of human rights.

Sudan, speaking as the concerned country, said this resolution was essential to provide technical assistance in an effective manner. It recognized challenges faced by the Government of Sudan, including in conflict areas, and encouraged the peace process. Sudan was committed to cooperate with the United Nations human rights mechanisms, and to collaborate fully with the Independent Expert. Sudan called for the adoption of this resolution without a vote.

Action on Resolution on Advisory Services and Technical Assistance for Cambodia

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.22_Rev.1) on advisory services and technical assistance for Cambodia, adopted without a vote as orally revised, the Council reaffirms the need for the Government of Cambodia to strengthen efforts to consolidate the rule of law, including through the adoption and further implementation of essential laws and codes for establishing a democratic society and an independent judiciary; urges the Government of Cambodia to take appropriate measures to encourage and enable civil society, including independent trade unions and the media, to play a constructive role in consolidating democratic development in Cambodia; invites the Secretary-General, agencies of the United Nations system present in Cambodia and the international community, including civil society, to continue to work with the Government of Cambodia in strengthening democracy as well as ensuring the protection and promotion of the human rights of all people in Cambodia, including by providing assistance; and decides to extend by two years the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, and requests the Special Rapporteur to report on the implementation of her mandate to the Council at its thirty-third and thirty-sixth sessions.

Japan, introducing the draft resolution on Cambodia as the main sponsor, said that the main purpose was to extend the mandate of the Special Rapporteur for an additional two years. The Government had placed high priority to the activities of civil society and press freedom in Cambodia. The Special Rapporteur was a key actor to monitor and report the appropriate implementation of programmes and policies. The delegation appreciated the efforts for the preparation of the draft resolution, and hoped that the Council would adopt it with a consensus.

Cambodia, speaking as the concerned country, thanked Japan for introducing the draft resolution. Cambodia commended the cooperative efforts to reach a mutually acceptable solution and the Rapporteur’s transparent monitoring of the Government’s activities. Cambodia was ready to continue to have a constructive dialogue with the Rapporteur and it had no intention to restrain the activities of non- governmental organizations.

Netherlands, speaking in a general comment on behalf of the European Union, was disappointed that the new draft did not properly reflect concerns regarding the recent adoption of the law on non-governmental organizations by Cambodia, which could restrict severely the activities of civil society. The European Union however continued to fully support the Special Procedure’s mandate on Cambodia.

United States, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, highlighted the need for the Supreme Chamber of Cambodia to be impartial and independent, and stressed the importance of judicial reforms in Cambodia.

Action on Resolution on National Policies and Human Rights

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.24) on national policies and human rights, adopted without a vote as orally revised, the Council requests the Office of the High Commissioner to organize, prior to the thirty-second session of the Human Rights Council, an expert workshop to discuss effective, inclusive and participatory mechanisms and methodologies to mainstream human rights on the formulation and implementation of public policies, and to invite States, relevant United Nations bodies, funds and programmes, intergovernmental organizations, treaty bodies, special procedures, regional human rights mechanisms, civil society organizations, academia, national human rights institutions and other relevant stakeholders to participate actively in the workshop; and also the requests the Office of the High Commissioner to prepare a summary report on the above-mentioned workshop and to submit it to the Human Rights Council at its thirty-third session.

Ecuador, introducing the draft resolution on national policies and human rights, said harmonising and boosting commitments to human rights required the implementation of public policies. It was vitally important that States integrated their obligations and commitments under international human rights law into their legislation. Ecuador invited all Member States to share best practices in order to compare the methodologies.

Peru, also introducing the draft resolution on national policies and human rights, thanked all delegations for their efforts in the preparation of the document. Peru highlighted that States should ensure the full realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Peru also recognised that each State had the right to choose the framework that was best suited to its particular needs. The Office of the High Commissioner was the right institution to ensure that efforts were not duplicated.

Action on Resolution on Promoting International Cooperation to Support National Human Rights Follow-up Systems and Processes

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.26) on promoting international cooperation to support national human rights follow-up systems and processes, adopted without a vote, the Council encourages States to establish and strengthen national human rights follow-up systems and processes and to seek, as needed, technical assistance and capacity-building; invites States to gradually increase their voluntary contributions to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights, the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance for the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review and other relevant trust funds; and requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue to provide technical assistance and capacity-building, upon request of and in accordance with the priorities set by the States concerned, on the establishment and strengthening of national follow-up systems and processes. It also requests the High Commissioner to organize an inter-sessional half-day panel discussion during the twenty-sixth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, to share experiences and good practices in the establishment and strengthening of national human rights follow-up systems.

Paraguay, introducing draft resolution L.26, said the Council would not be able to carry out its mandate unless States committed themselves to the implementation and follow-up of its decisions. This required support from the international community to national human rights follow-up systems and processes. This draft did not intend to impose any particular model, but rather encouraged States that had not yet done so to establish their own follow-up mechanism. This draft would convene a half-day panel discussion on this issue during the twenty-sixth session of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review. It would hopefully be adopted without a vote.

Brazil, also introducing draft resolution L.26, was firmly convinced of the importance of establishing national human rights follow-up systems and processes and of the crucial role of technical assistance and capacity building in this regard, through the work of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Such mechanisms could serve at translating international recommendations into domestic measures that would lead to an improvement of the human rights situation on the ground.

Sierra Leone, speaking in a general comment, said follow-up of Universal Periodic Review and treaty body recommendations could be hampered by the lack of technical assistance, even in cases where the political will was present. The lack of capacity was also sometimes the reason why States had to reject recommendations made to them.

South Africa, speaking in an explanation of the vote before the vote, said it would join the consensus on L.26, but wished to note with concern the proliferation of many resolutions duplicating existing initiatives. Recalling the existence of similar resolutions addressing the same issues, the delegation noted that it did not see any value added to the subject.


Action on Resolution on Technical Assistance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.30) on technical assistance and strengthening of capacities in the area of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, adopted without a vote, the Council invites the Government to continue its efforts, with the help of the international community, to put an end to the impunity, in the first place for perpetrators of sexual crimes, and for all violators of human rights; encourages the Government to continue its efforts to ensure a greater openness of the political space in the electoral context; and also encourages the Government to ensure protection of all political actors, civil society, journalists and human rights defenders, especially during the electoral period. It also requests the international community to give priority to structural assistance and assistance of long duration, on the entirety of the territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in order to optimize the long-term impact of technical assistance programmes.

Algeria, introducing draft resolution L.30 on behalf of the African Group, said the text highlighted efforts by the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the field of human rights, as well as the contribution of the United Nations Joint Office in Kinshasa to these improvements. It welcomed the establishment of criminal courts, and encouraged the Government to continue its efforts. It also called on the international community to continue its technical assistance and capacity building to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The African Group urged the Council to adopt this resolution by consensus.

Netherlands, speaking in a general comment on behalf of the European Union, said it remained deeply concerned at human rights challenges in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including impunity for perpetrators of sexual violence and other human rights violations. It was essential that the Democratic Republic of the Congo strengthened its efforts to ensure accountability. The Council should remain preoccupied in view of the forthcoming elections. More explicit reference to arbitrary detentions and harassment against human rights defenders should have been included in the resolution. The European Union encouraged the Democratic Republic of the Congo to continue and strengthen its cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner and mechanisms of the Human Rights Council.

Democratic Republic of Congo, speaking as the concerned country, highlighted that the draft text reflected the determination of the Government to address all sorts of violations taking place in the country. Thanking the African Group for its cooperation and constructive dialogue, the delegation appreciated that the Group paid particular attention to the difficult challenges the country was facing. The Government, over the years, had continued to fight to establish permanent peace in the country. Several initiatives undertaken by the Government targeted the promotion and protection of human rights, including strengthening the efforts to fight against impunity. Recently, the Government had adopted a new law, which enabled it to set up a special unit and appoint new representatives to deal with human rights violations.

Action on Resolution on Technical Cooperation and Capacity Building for Burundi in the Field of Human Rights

In a resolution (A_HRC_30_L.31) on technical cooperation and capacity building for Burundi in the field of human rights, adopted without a vote as orally revised, the Council calls upon all parties to refrain from any action that could exacerbate tensions in Burundi and to take into account the best interests of the country and to safeguard the Arusha Accords; calls upon the authorities of Burundi to conduct thorough and independent investigations of all violations and abuses of human rights, so that all perpetrators, regardless of their affiliation, are brought to justice; and also calls upon the authorities of Burundi to ensure the protection of citizens against intimidation and all acts of violence, and to respect, protect and guarantee all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. It also requests the High Commissioner to continue to provide and strengthen his activities in technical assistance and capacity-building as requested by the Government of Burundi through his office established in Burundi, and to present to the Human Rights Council, at its thirty-first session, in an interactive dialogue, an oral update and, at its thirty-second session, a written report in an interactive dialogue on the implementation of the present resolution.

Algeria, introducing draft resolution L.31 on behalf of the African Group, said Burundi was currently having problems with violence, which had led to human rights violations. The draft resolution contained updated information on the situation on the ground, taken from reports by the Office of the High Commissioner and Special Procedures. The resolution called for an end to violence, and for technical assistance in the field of human rights. It welcomed and encouraged efforts by the African Union and the East African Community to support Burundi and end violence.

Netherlands, speaking in a general comment on behalf of the European Union, said it was concerned about the deterioration of the human rights situation in Burundi, including arbitrary detentions, murders and torture by the police forces. It was important that the Council was seized of the matter to prevent further escalation, and the Council had to remain attentive to developments and be prepared to take further action if the situation further deteriorated.

United States, speaking in a general statement, appreciated the work of the African Group and the European Union, as well as the concerned State. However, serious human rights violations needed to be addressed in Burundi. As reflected in the draft, the delegation remained deeply concerned about the future of civilians in Burundi. Accordingly, the delegation urged Burundi to take all necessary measures to bring permanent peace to the country.

Burundi, speaking as the concerned country, thanked all States for submitting the balanced text, helping to bring stability to Burundi. Over the years, the Government had made amendments to the laws, and established democratic institutions. However, it still needed technical and financial assistance to make further progress.

Japan, speaking in an explanation of the vote after the vote, said the cost for the organization of panels had to be covered within existing resources.

Netherland, speaking in an explanation of the vote after the vote, was extremely concerned about the situation in Yemen and violations of human rights and international law committed by all sides there. The number of civilian casualties had reached thousands. Four out of five Yemenis required humanitarian assistance, and 1.5 million people were displaced. The Netherlands had tirelessly worked on a balanced resolution in the Council. It regretted that it was unable to present a resolution this year and that it was not able to co-sponsor the draft resolution tabled by Saudi Arabia.

Germany, speaking in an explanation of the vote after the vote, was extremely concerned about the high number of civilian casualties in Yemen, including women and girls, and by human rights violations by all parties. It was also concerned at reports of the recruitment of children in the armed forces. Germany would have preferred a resolution clearly recalling all parties’ obligations under international law and establishing an international inquiry mechanism.

__________

For use of the information media; not an official record