Debt restructuring, vulture funds and human rights
Summary
As sovereign insolvency has obvious implications for the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights by debtors’ populations and of their right to development, international human rights law should be considered when defining and identifying the rules governing debt restructuring processes. Standstill agreements, seniority, the distribution of financial losses between debtors and creditors and among creditors, the legitimacy of decision-making processes, holdout creditors’ rights, and the procedural and substantive aspects of vulture funds litigation are concrete examples of problems and challenges posed by every debt restructuring.
In this report, the Independent Expert presents his findings in this area and when suitable, advocates for a human rights-based approach to debt restructuring and debt relief.
Timeline of work undertaken
The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted on 9 September 2014 resolution 68/304 in which it decided to elaborate through a process of intergovernmental negotiations a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes.
On 26 January 2015, the Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky made a submission to the ad-hoc committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/247 that was tasked with elaborating a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes. He identified six human rights benchmarks States should consider during their negotiations.
On 25 February 2015, the Independent Expert was invited to a take part in a session by the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee that had been requested by Human Rights Council resolution 27/30 to prepare a research-based report on the activities of vulture funds and their impact on human rights. His remarks and suggestions are available here.
In August 2015 the Advisory Committee of the Human Rights Council considered a draft progress report on the issue (A/HRC/AC/15/CRP.1). The Advisory Committee submitted its progress report on vulture funds and human rights to the thirty-third session of the Human Rights Council in September 2016 (A/HRC/33/54).
On 10 September 2015, the General Assembly adopted resolution 69/319 declaring that sovereign debt restructuring processes should be guided by nine Basic Principles, including the right to sovereign debt restructuring, good faith, transparency, equitable treatment, sovereign immunity, legitimacy, sustainability and the principle of majority restructuring.
The General Assembly emphasised that sustainability implies that sovereign debt restructuring workouts are completed in a timely and efficient manner and lead to a stable debt situation in the debtor State, preserving at the outset creditors’ rights while promoting sustained and inclusive economic growth and sustainable development, minimising economic and social costs, warranting the stability of the international financial system and respecting human rights.
The Independent Expert welcomed the adoption of the Basic Principles on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes, calling them as a positive step towards clarifying which existing rules and principles of international law apply to sovereign debt issues. He underlined that the Basic Principles reflect to a large extent reflects customary law and general principles of international law and are in this respect binding. His statement is available here. In his report to the seventeenth session of the General Assembly in 2015 (A/70/275), the Independent Expert included a reflection how to balance contractual debt obligations with human rights obligations.
Letters and submissions:
- Statement by the Independent Expert, side event on foreign debt and human rights, 4 March 2015
- Remarks by the Independent Expert on vulture funds and human rights at the 14th session of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee, 25 February 2015
- Submission by the Independent Expert, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky to the ad-hoc committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/247 tasked with elaborating through a process of intergovernmental negotiations, a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes:
Six human rights benchmarks States should consider - Views by the Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, on the initiative of the Group of G77 and China to establish a multilateral legal framework to regulate debt restructuring processes Letter, 5 September 2014
- States of Jersey: Consultation concerning promotion of debt relief for poorer countries. Submission by Cephas Lumina, Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights from 8 December 2011
Reports:
- Report to the General Assembly (A/70/275) from 4 August 2015 by Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights
- Report of the Advisory Committee of the Human Rights Council on vulture funds and human rights (A/HRC/33/54) from 20 July 2016
- Thematic report on vulture funds and human rights (A/HRC/14/21), from 29 April 2010, by Cephas Lumina, Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights
- Country visit report, Argentina (A/HRC/25/50/Add.3), from 2 April 2014, by Cephas Lumina, Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights
Resolutions of the Human Rights Council:
Resolutions of the General Assembly:
- Resolution 69/319: Basic Principles on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes
- Resolution 69/247
- Resolution 68/304
Press statements:
- 15 June 2016: Belgian legislation against vulture funds should be preserved – UN rights expert urges
- 10 September 2015: Restructuring of sovereign debt: UN Expert stresses GA principles are binding
- 27 November 2014: Human rights impact must be addressed in vulture fund litigation – UN experts
- 10 September 2014: UN rights expert welcomes decision to establish a multilateral legal framework for debt restructuring
- 13 December 2013: Argentina/Ghana: ‘Vulture funds’ should not be allowed to paralyze debt relief, says UN expert on the eve of key ruling
- 13 December 2011: UN expert urges Jersey to curb ‘vulture funds’ ability to sue heavily indebted poor countries in its courts
- 18 May 2011: ‘Vulture funds’ – UN expert welcomes UK law to halt profiteering, but warns the fight is not over yet
More information: Research report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on vulture funds
VIEW THIS PAGE IN: